The Difference between Epistemic and Metaphysical Necessity

Synthese (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Philosophers have observed that metaphysical necessity appears to be a true or real or genuine form of necessity while epistemic necessity does not. Similarly, natural necessity appears genuine while deontic necessity does not. But what is it for a form of necessity to be genuine? I defend an account of genuine necessity in explanatory terms. The genuine forms of necessity, I argue, are those that provide what I call necessitarian explanation. I discuss the relationship of necessitarian explanation to ground.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GLATDB-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-06-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-06-02

Total views
407 ( #11,771 of 53,697 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
117 ( #4,178 of 53,697 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.