The difference between epistemic and metaphysical necessity

Synthese 198 (Suppl 6):1409-1424 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Philosophers have observed that metaphysical necessity appears to be a true or real or genuine form of necessity while epistemic necessity does not. Similarly, natural necessity appears genuine while deontic necessity does not. But what is it for a form of necessity to be genuine? I defend an account of genuine necessity in explanatory terms. The genuine forms of necessity, I argue, are those that provide what I call necessitarianexplanation. I discuss the relationship of necessitarian explanation to ground.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GLATDB-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-06-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-06-02

Total views
568 ( #10,855 of 64,082 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #11,925 of 64,082 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.