Human Dignity and the Non-Utilitarist Consequentialist Ethics of Social Consequences

Filozofia 59:502-506 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Prominent critics of consequentialism hold that utilitarianism is not capable of accepting authentic human values, because the consequentialist viewpoint is impersonal. According to it consequentialist rationality has no axiological limits and it can think about doing the unthinkable. The main objective of the paper is to show that human dignity has a significant position in the author’s conception of ethics of social consequences arguing for a particular theory of the value of human dignity. The author argues that the ethics of social consequences is capable of accepting human dignity as well as all authentic human moral values. He believes that ethical theory of social consequences can provide the element missing whose lack was unveiled by the critics of utilitarianism

Author's Profile

Vasil Gluchman
Comenius University In Bratislava (Doctorate)


Added to PP

235 (#38,636)

6 months
22 (#56,041)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?