Scientific realism with historical essences: the case of species

Synthese:1-17 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Natural kinds, real kinds, or, following J.S Mill simply, Kinds, are thought to be an important asset for scientific realists in the non-fundamental (or “special”) sciences. Essential natures are less in vogue. I show that the realist would do well to couple her Kinds with essential natures in order to strengthen their epistemic and ontological credentials. I argue that these essential natures need not however be intrinsic to the Kind’s members; they may be historical. I concentrate on assessing the merits of historical essential natures in a paradigm case of Kinds in the non-fundamental sciences: species. I specify two basic jobs for essential natures: 1) offering individuation criteria, and 2) providing a causal explanation of the Kind’s multiple projectable properties. I argue that at least in the case of species historical essences are fit for both tasks. The principled resistance to Kinds with historical essences should also be cleared.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GODSRW
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Real Patterns.Dennett, Daniel C.
Natural Kindness.Slater, Matthew

View all 45 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-11-21

Total views
216 ( #19,661 of 48,762 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
53 ( #12,464 of 48,762 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.