Conceptual Art, Social Psychology, And Deception

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Some works of conceptual art require deception for their appreciation—deception of the viewer of the work. Some experiments in social psychology equally require deception— deception of the participants in the experiment. There are a number of close parallels between the two kinds of deception. And yet, in spite of these parallels, the art world, artists, and philosophers of art, do not seem to be troubled about the deception involved, whereas deception is a constant source of worry for social psychologists. Intuitively, each of these responses might seem appropriate for its sphere, but it is not easy to see what grounds these intuitions.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GOLCAS-5
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-05-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-05-06

Total views
54 ( #41,241 of 50,119 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #32,860 of 50,119 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.