Can there be a Finite Interpretation of the Kantian Sublime?

Kant Yearbook 11 (1):17-39 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Kant’s account of the sublime makes frequent appeals to infinity, appeals which have been extensively criticised by commentators such as Budd and Crowther. This paper examines the costs and benefits of reconstructing the account in finitist terms. On the one hand, drawing on a detailed comparison of the first and third Critiques, I argue that the underlying logic of Kant’s position is essentially finitist. I defend the approach against longstanding objections, as well as addressing recent infinitist work by Moore and Smith. On the other hand, however, I argue that finitism faces distinctive problems of its own: whilst the resultant theory is a coherent and interesting one, it is unclear in what sense it remains an analysis of the sublime. I illustrate the worry by juxtaposing the finitist reading with analytical cubism.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GOLCTB
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-09-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-09-22

Total views
42 ( #39,953 of 45,642 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #19,409 of 45,642 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.