Safety, Closure, and Extended Methods

Journal of Philosophy 121 (1):26-54 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent research has identified a tension between the Safety principle that knowledge is belief without risk of error, and the Closure principle that knowledge is preserved by competent deduction. Timothy Williamson reconciles Safety and Closure by proposing that when an agent deduces a conclusion from some premises, the agent’s method for believing the conclusion includes their method for believing each premise. We argue that this theory is untenable because it implies problematically easy epistemic access to one’s methods. Several possible solutions are explored and rejected.

Author Profiles

Simon Goldstein
University of Hong Kong
John Hawthorne
Australian Catholic University

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-01

Downloads
571 (#25,672)

6 months
252 (#7,831)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?