Still Particular: A Reply to Ganson and Mehta

Abstract

We are grateful to Ganson and Mehta (forthcoming) for their reply to our defence of phenomenal particularism against the objections raised by Mehta in his (2014). Their reply clarifies the nature of their objections to phenomenal particularism and helps identify the locus of our disagreements. In what follows we aim to defend phenomenal particularism against the objections raised in their reply.

Author Profiles

Craig French
Nottingham University
Anil Gomes
University of Oxford

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-15

Downloads
838 (#21,259)

6 months
149 (#33,081)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?