Schroeder and Whiting on Knowledge and Defeat

Logos and Episteme 7 (2):231-238 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Daniel Whiting has argued, in this journal, that Mark Schroeder’s analysis of knowledge in terms of subjectively and objectively sufficient reasons for belief makes wrong predictions in fake barn cases. Schroeder has replied that this problem may be avoided if one adopts a suitable account of perceptual reasons. I argue that Schroeder’s reply fails to deal with the general worry underlying Whiting’s purported counterexample, because one can construct analogous potential counterexamples that do not involve perceptual reasons at all. Nevertheless, I claim that it is possible to overcome Whiting’s objection, by showing that it rests on an inadequate characterization of how defeat works in the examples in question.

Author's Profile

Javier González De Prado Salas
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-08

Downloads
420 (#34,760)

6 months
87 (#41,781)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?