A Novel Category of Vague Abstracta

Metaphysica 8 (1):79-96 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Much attention has been given to the question of ontic vagueness, and the issues usually center around whether certain paradigmatically concrete entities – cats, clouds, mountains, etc. – are vague in the sense of having indeterminate spatial boundaries. In this paper, however, I wish to focus on a way in which some abstracta seem to be locationally vague. To begin, I will briefly cover some territory already covered regarding certain types of “traditional” abstracta and the ways they are currently alleged to be vague. I then wish to discuss two types of “nontraditional” abstracta and the sense in which I think some of these objects are locationally vague. I will next reexamine some of the traditional abstracta and discuss whether any of these objects are locationally vague in the novel way suggested for the nontraditional sorts. I’ll finish by discussing objections, and conclude with some remarks about characterizing the abstract/concrete distinction.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GOOANC
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-09-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Parts: A Study in Ontology.Peter Simons - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
Nonexistence.Salmon, Nathan
Fiction and Metaphysics.Thomasson, Amie L.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-02-25

Total views
159 ( #21,648 of 44,421 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #19,180 of 44,421 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.