Know-How, procedural knowledge, and choking under pressure

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I examine two explanatory models of choking: the representationalist model and the anti-representationalist model. The representationalist model is based largely on Anderson's ACT model of procedural knowledge and is developed by Masters, Beilock and Carr. The antirepresentationalist model is based on dynamical models of cognition and embodied action and is developed by Dreyfus who employs an antirepresentational view of know-how. I identify the models' similarities and differences. I then suggest that Dreyfus is wrong to believe representational activity requires reflection and attention. I also argue that the representationalist model of choking is preferable, since some embodied actions require appeals to representations, something not available to Dreyfus's anti-representational model
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-11-02
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
710 ( #8,332 of 65,614 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #19,098 of 65,614 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.