A Sensible Speciesism?

Philosophical Inquiries 4 (1):49-70 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In his essay “The Human Prejudice” Bernard Williams presented a sophisticated defense of the moral relevance of the concept “human being”. Here I offer both an analysis of his essay and a defense of his conclusions against criticisms made by Julian Savulescu and Peter Singer. After a discussion of the structure of Williams’s argument, I focus on several complaints from Savulescu: that Williams underestimates the similarities between speciesism and racism or sexism, that Williams relies on a disputable internalism about reasons to make his case, that Williams ignores the arbitrariness of species membership, and (a complaint also made by Singer) that Williams attacks a straw man in considering only negative utilitarianism when criticizing the idea of an Impartial Observer. I defend Williams against these charges and end with a brief discussion of how his alien invasion example illustrates the fundamentally different philosophical sensibility of Bernard Williams in comparison to critics like Savulescu and Singer.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GRAASS-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-11-27
Latest version: 2 (2017-06-13)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
On Bullshit.Frankfurt, Harry
The Human Prejudice.Williams, Bernard

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-11-21

Total views
1,879 ( #972 of 46,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
754 ( #323 of 46,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.