Global consequentialism and the morality and laws of war

In McDermott and Roser Kuosmanen (ed.), Human rights and 21st century challenges. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Rights-based approaches and consequentialist approaches to ethics are often seen as being diametrically opposed to one another. In one sense, they are. In another sense, however, they can be reconciled: a ‘global’ form of consequentialism might supply consequentialist foundations for a derivative morality that is non-consequentialist, and perhaps rights-based, in content. By way of case study to illustrate how this might work, I survey what a global consequentialist should think about a recent dispute between Jeff McMahan and Henry Shue on the morality and laws of war.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GREGCA-5
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-07-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Reasons and Persons.Margolis, Joseph
Global Consequentialism.Pettit, Philip & Smith, Michael

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-07-08

Total views
105 ( #32,304 of 49,980 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #28,333 of 49,980 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.