Is There a Role for ‘Human Nature’ in Debates About Human Enhancement?

Philosophy 90 (4):623-651 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In discussions about the ethics of enhancement, it is often claimed that the concept of ‘human nature’ has no helpful role to play. There are two ideas behind this thought. The first is that nature, human nature included, is a mixed bag. Some parts of our nature are good for us and some are bad for us. The ‘mixed bag’ idea leads naturally to the second idea, namely that the fact that something is part of our nature is, by itself, normatively inert. The Inert View claims that nothing normative follows from the mere fact that some trait is a part of our nature. If the Inert View is correct, then appeals to the value or importance of human nature in debates about enhancement are indeed misplaced. We argue that the Inert View is wrong, and that a certain concept of human nature – which we refer to as human form – does have an important role to play in debates about enhancement.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GROITA-9
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-06-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Human Engineering and Climate Change.Liao, S. Matthew; Sandberg, Anders & Roache, Rebecca
Foot Note.Lewens, Tim

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-06-13

Total views
376 ( #9,436 of 44,292 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #8,467 of 44,292 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.