Linguistic Intuitions: Error Signals and the Voice of Competence

In Samuel Schindler, Anna Drożdżowicz & Karen Brøcker (eds.), Linguistic Intuitions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Linguistic intuitions are a central source of evidence across a variety of linguistic domains. They have also long been a source of controversy. This chapter aims to illuminate the etiology and evidential status of at least some linguistic intuitions by relating them to error signals of the sort posited by accounts of on-line monitoring of speech production and comprehension. The suggestion is framed as a novel reply to Michael Devitt’s claim that linguistic intuitions are theory-laden “central systems” responses, rather than endorsed outputs of a modularized language faculty (the “Voice of Competence”). Along the way, it is argued that linguistic intuitions may not constitute a natural kind with a common etiology; and that, for a range of cases, the process by which intuitions used in linguistics are generated amounts to little more than comprehension.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GROLIE
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-01-22
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-01-22

Total views
155 ( #35,623 of 2,448,675 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #27,166 of 2,448,675 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.