Is Meaning Normative?

In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophy of Language and Linguistics. Frankfurt: Ontos. pp. 55-63 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to Paul Boghossian, the claim that the concept of linguistic meaning is normative has no plausibility whatever. In this paper, I criticize Boghossian's argument for this conclusion and maintain that there is a strong case for saying that the concept of meaning is normative. First, I sketch an easy to handle version of the argument in question. Then, I use MacFarlane's work on the significance of "true" to maintain that the argument relies on an illicit assumption. Finally, I show what supports the claim that meaning is normative by reflecting on the structure of an explanation of a case of successful communication in terms of meaning.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GUAIMN
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-09-05
Latest version: 2 (2017-11-28)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Kripke's Account of the Rule‚ÄźFollowing Considerations.Andrea Guardo - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):366-388.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-09-05

Total views
372 ( #11,812 of 50,239 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
97 ( #5,121 of 50,239 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.