Group Knowledge, Questions, and the Division of Epistemic Labour

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Discussions of group knowledge typically focus on whether a group’s knowledge that p reduces to group members’ knowledge that p. Drawing on the cumulative reading of collective knowledge ascriptions and considerations about the importance of the division of epistemic labour, I argue what I call the Fragmented Knowledge account, which allows for more complex relations between individual and collective knowledge. According to this account, a group can know an answer to a question in virtue of members of the group knowing parts of that answer, when the whole answer is available to group-level action. I argue that this account explains a swathe of central cases of group knowledge, as well as explaining some central features of group knowledge.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HABGKQ
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-11-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-11-06

Total views
55 ( #34,847 of 43,720 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #12,850 of 43,720 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.