How the Polls Can Be Both Spot On and Dead Wrong: Using Choice Blindness to Shift Political Attitudes and Voter Intentions

PLoS ONE 8 (4):e60554. doi:10.1371/journal.pone (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Political candidates often believe they must focus their campaign efforts on a small number of swing voters open for ideological change. Based on the wisdom of opinion polls, this might seem like a good idea. But do most voters really hold their political attitudes so firmly that they are unreceptive to persuasion? We tested this premise during the most recent general election in Sweden, in which a left- and a right-wing coalition were locked in a close race. We asked our participants to state their voter intention, and presented them with a political survey of wedge issues between the two coalitions. Using a sleight-of-hand we then altered their replies to place them in the opposite political camp, and invited them to reason about their attitudes on the manipulated issues. Finally, we summarized their survey score, and asked for their voter intention again. The results showed that no more than 22% of the manipulated replies were detected, and that a full 92% of the participants accepted and endorsed our altered political survey score. Furthermore, the final voter intention question indicated that as many as 48% (69.2%) were willing to consider a left-right coalition shift. This can be contrasted with the established polls tracking the Swedish election, which registered maximally 10% voters open for a swing. Our results indicate that political attitudes and partisan divisions can be far more flexible than what is assumed by the polls, and that people can reason about the factual issues of the campaign with considerable openness to change.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HALHTP-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-05-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Selective Laziness of Reasoning.Trouche, Emmanuel; Johansson, Petter; Hall, Lars & Mercier, Hugo
Disagreement and the Division of Epistemic Labor.Hallsson, Bjørn G. & Kappel, Klemens

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-05-02

Total views
226 ( #15,923 of 43,961 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #14,869 of 43,961 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.