Lifting the Veil of Morality: Choice Blindness and Attitude Reversals on a Self-Transforming Survey

PLoS ONE 7 (9):e45457. doi:10.1371/journal.pone (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Every day, thousands of polls, surveys, and rating scales are employed to elicit the attitudes of humankind. Given the ubiquitous use of these instruments, it seems we ought to have firm answers to what is measured by them, but unfortunately we do not. To help remedy this situation, we present a novel approach to investigate the nature of attitudes. We created a self-transforming paper survey of moral opinions, covering both foundational principles, and current dilemmas hotly debated in the media. This survey used a magic trick to expose participants to a reversal of their previously stated attitudes, allowing us to record whether they were prepared to endorse and argue for the opposite view of what they had stated only moments ago. The result showed that the majority of the reversals remained undetected, and a full 69% of the participants failed to detect at least one of two changes. In addition, participants often constructed coherent and unequivocal arguments supporting the opposite of their original position. These results suggest a dramatic potential for flexibility in our moral attitudes, and indicates a clear role for self-attribution and post-hoc rationalization in attitude formation and change.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HALLTV
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-05-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-05-02

Total views
363 ( #18,548 of 64,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #43,941 of 64,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.