A Moral Argument for Substance Dualism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper presents a moral argument in support of the view that the mind is a nonphysical object. It is intuitively obvious that we, the bearers of conscious experiences, have an inherent value that is not reducible to the value of our conscious experiences. It remains intuitively obvious that we have inherent value even when we represent ourselves to have no physical bodies whatsoever. Given certain assumptions about morality and moral intuitions, this implies that the bearers of conscious experiences—the objects possessing inherent value—are not physical objects. This moral evidence is corroborated by introspective evidence.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-03-25
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
876 ( #5,691 of 2,448,879 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
76 ( #7,820 of 2,448,879 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.