How to Apply Molinism to the Theological Problem of Moral Luck

Faith and Philosophy 31 (1):68-90 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The problem of moral luck is that a general fact about luck and an intuitive moral principle jointly imply the following skeptical conclusion: human beings are morally responsible for at most a tiny fraction of each action. This skeptical conclusion threatens to undermine the claim that human beings deserve their respective eternal reward and punishment. But even if this restriction on moral responsibility is compatible with the doctrine of the final judgment, the quality of one’s afterlife within heaven or hell still appears to be lucky. Utilizing recent responses to the problem of moral luck, I explore several Molinist accounts of the final judgment that resolve both theological problems of moral luck. Some of these accounts entirely eliminate moral luck while others ensure that the moral luck involved in the judgment is overall good luck. (DOWNLOAD the published version at the external link below.)
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-03-16
Latest version: 3 (2021-06-30)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
1,018 ( #4,735 of 2,454,490 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
85 ( #7,539 of 2,454,490 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.