Immoralism and the Valence Constraint

British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (1):45-64 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Immoralists hold that in at least some cases, moral fl aws in artworks can increase their aesthetic value. They deny what I call the valence constraint: the view that any effect that an artwork’s moral value has on its aesthetic merit must have the same valence. The immoralist offers three arguments against the valence constraint. In this paper I argue that these arguments fail, and that this failure reveals something deep and interesting about the relationship between cognitive and moral value. In the fi nal section I offer a positive argument for the valence constraint.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-08-23
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
1,499 ( #2,612 of 2,448,580 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
97 ( #5,807 of 2,448,580 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.