Immoralism and the Valence Constraint

British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (1):45-64 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Immoralists hold that in at least some cases, moral fl aws in artworks can increase their aesthetic value. They deny what I call the valence constraint: the view that any effect that an artwork’s moral value has on its aesthetic merit must have the same valence. The immoralist offers three arguments against the valence constraint. In this paper I argue that these arguments fail, and that this failure reveals something deep and interesting about the relationship between cognitive and moral value. In the fi nal section I offer a positive argument for the valence constraint.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HARIAT
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-08-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Art, Ethics, and Critical Pluralism.Thomson-Jones, Katherine

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
797 ( #2,337 of 39,000 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
170 ( #1,973 of 39,000 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.