The ethics of non-realist fiction: Morality's catch-22

Philosophia 35 (2):145-159 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The topic of this essay is how non-realistic novels challenge our philosophical understanding of the moral significance of literature. I consider just one case: Joseph Heller’s Catch-22. I argue that standard philosophical views, based as they are on realistic models of literature, fail to capture the moral significance of this work. I show that Catch-22 succeeds morally because of the ways it resists using standard realistic techniques, and suggest that philosophical discussion of ethics and literature must be pluralistic if it is to include all morally salient literature, and not just novels in the “Great Tradition” and their ilk.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-08-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Moral Persuasion and the Diversity of Fictions.Shen-yi Liao - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3):269-289.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
1,407 ( #962 of 39,015 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1,032 ( #178 of 39,015 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.