Whose models? Which representations? A response to Wagner

Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (12):850-851 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

InWhere the Ethical Action Is,we argued that medical and ethical modes of thought are not different in kind but different aspects of a situation. One of the consequences of this argument is that the requirement for or benefits of normative moral theorising in bioethics is undercut. In response, Wagner has argued that normative moral theories should be reconceived as models. Wagner’s argument seems to be that once reconceived as models, the rationale for moral theorising, undercut by our arguments inWhere the Ethical Action Is,will be re-established because we will see those moral-theories-now-rebranded-as-models as serving a role akin to the role models serve in some of the natural sciences. In this response to Wagner, we provide two arguments against Wagner’s proposal. We call these arguments the Turner-Cicourel Challenge and the Question Begging Challenge.

Author Profiles

Phil Hutchinson
Manchester Metropolitan University
Doug Hardman
Bournemouth University

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-27

Downloads
29 (#98,126)

6 months
24 (#97,150)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?