Epistemology and Science in the Image of Modern Philosophy: Rorty on Descartes and Locke

In Juliet Floyd & Sanford Shieh (eds.), Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth Century Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 393–413 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979), Richard Rorty locates the perceived ills of modern philosophy in the "epistemological turn" of Descartes and Locke. This chapter argues that Rorty's accounts of Descartes' and Locke's philosophical work are seriously flawed. Rorty misunderstood the participation of early modern philosophers in the rise of modern science, and he misdescribed their examination of cognition as psychological rather than epistemological. His diagnostic efforts were thereby undermined, and he missed Descartes' original conception of a general physics, and Locke's probabilist analysis of the grounds for rational belief.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HATEAS
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-12-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-10-22

Total downloads
166 ( #14,391 of 35,877 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
80 ( #3,821 of 35,877 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.