Must Naturalism Lead to a Deflationary Meta-Ontology?

Metaphysica 15 (2):347-367 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Huw Price has argued that naturalistic philosophy inevitably leads to a deflationary approach to ontological questions. In this paper, I rebut these arguments. A more substantive, less language-focused approach to metaphysics remains open to naturalists. However, rebutting one of Price’s main arguments requires rejecting Quine’s criterion of ontological commitment. So, even though Price’s argument is unsound, it reveals that naturalists cannot rest content with broadly Quinean, “mainstream metaphysics,” which, I suggest, naturalists also have independent reasons to reject.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HAUMNL
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-06-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-06-02

Total downloads
310 ( #8,117 of 37,148 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #7,015 of 37,148 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.