Skepticism and the Value of Knowledge

In Chienkuo Mi Ruey-lin Chen (ed.), Naturalized Epistemology and Philosophy of Science (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The main claim of this essay is that knowledge is no more
valuable than lasting true belief.
This claim is surprising. Doesn't knowledge have a unique
and special value? If the main claim is correct and if, as it seems,
knowledge is not lasting true belief, then knowledge does not have a unique value:
in whatever way knowledge is valuable, lasting true belief is just as valuable.
However, this result does not show that knowledge is worthless, nor does it undermine
our knowledge gathering practices. There is, rather, a positive philosophical payoff:
skepticism about knowledge is defused. Assuming one can have lasting true belief,
then even if one cannot have knowledge, one can have something just as valuable.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2010-04-25
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
577 ( #7,191 of 52,686 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #20,069 of 52,686 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.