Why Even a Liberal Can Justify Limited Paternalistic Intervention in Anorexia Nervosa

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Most adult persons with anorexia satisfy the existing criteria widely used to assess decision-making capacity, meaning that incapacity typically cannot be used to justify coercive intervention. After rejecting two other approaches to justification, Professor Radden concludes that it is most likely not possible to justify coercive medical intervention for persons with anorexia in liberal terms, though she leaves it open whether some other framework might succeed. I shall assume here that the standard approach to assessing decisionmaking capacity is adequate.1 The question then is whether we can justify—within a liberal framework—coercive intervention with the decision of a competent...
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HAWWEA
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-02-03
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-02-03

Total views
92 ( #46,100 of 2,449,148 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #9,740 of 2,449,148 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.