Crash Algorithms for Autonomous Cars: How the Trolley Problem Can Move Us Beyond Harm Minimisation

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (3):685-698 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The prospective introduction of autonomous cars into public traffic raises the question of how such systems should behave when an accident is inevitable. Due to concerns with self-interest and liberal legitimacy that have become paramount in the emerging debate, a contractarian framework seems to provide a particularly attractive means of approaching this problem. We examine one such attempt, which derives a harm minimisation rule from the assumptions of rational self-interest and ignorance of one’s position in a future accident. We contend, however, that both contractarian approaches and harm minimisation standards are flawed, due to a failure to account for the fundamental difference between those ‘involved’ and ‘uninvolved’ in an impending crash. Drawing from classical works on the trolley problem, we show how this notion can be substantiated by reference to either the distinction between negative and positive rights, or to differences in people’s claims. By supplementing harm minimisation with corresponding constraints, we can develop crash algorithms for autonomous cars which are both ethically adequate and promise to overcome certain significant practical barriers to implementation.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HBNCAF
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-07-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-07-24

Total views
304 ( #10,534 of 41,643 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
160 ( #2,458 of 41,643 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.