In Defense of Formal Relationism

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):243-250 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In his paper “Flaws of Formal Relationism”, Mahrad Almotahari argues against the sort of response to Frege's Puzzle I have defended elsewhere, which he dubs ‘Formal Relationism’. Almotahari argues that, because of its specifically formal character, this view is vulnerable to objections that cannot be raised against the otherwise similar Semantic Relationism due to Kit Fine. I argue in response that Formal Relationism has neither of the flaws Almotahari claims to identify
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HECIDO
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-05-01
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-09-28

Total views
149 ( #27,222 of 51,738 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #35,563 of 51,738 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.