Expressivism and Explaining Irrationality: Reply to Baker

Erkenntnis:1-14 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In a recent paper in this journal, Derek Baker (Erkenntnis 83(4):829–852, 2018) raises an objection to expressivism as it has been developed by Mark Schroeder (Being for, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008). Baker argues that Schroeder’s expressivist (1) is committed to certain sentences expressing rationally incoherent states of mind, and he objects (2) that the expressivist cannot explain why these states would be rationally incoherent. The aim of this paper is to show that Baker’s argument for (1) is unsound, and that (1) is unlikely to be true. This obviates the need to explain the alleged rational incoherence, and so Baker’s objection to Schroeder’s expressivism is undermined.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-02-08
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #57,186 of 64,210 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #38,904 of 64,210 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.