Norms Affect Prospective Causal Judgments

Cognitive Science 45 (1):e12931 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
People more frequently select norm-violating factors, relative to norm- conforming ones, as the cause of some outcome. Until recently, this abnormal-selection effect has been studied using retrospective vignette-based paradigms. We use a novel set of video stimuli to investigate this effect for prospective causal judgments—i.e., judgments about the cause of some future outcome. Four experiments show that people more frequently select norm- violating factors, relative to norm-conforming ones, as the cause of some future outcome. We show that the abnormal-selection effects are not primarily explained by the perception of agency (Experiment 4). We discuss these results in relation to recent efforts to model causal judgment.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HENNAP-3
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-01-03
Latest version: 2 (2021-01-11)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-01-03

Total views
114 ( #36,571 of 56,987 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #27,873 of 56,987 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.