Can an evidential account justify relying on preferences for well-being policy?

Journal of Economic Methodology 22 (3):280-291 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Policy-makers sometimes aim to improve well-being as a policy goal, but to do this they need some way to measure well-being. Instead of relying on potentially problematic theories of well-being to justify their choice of well-being measure, Daniel Hausman proposes that policy-makers can sometimes rely on preference-based measures as evidence for well-being. I claim that Hausman’s evidential account does not justify the use of any one measure more than it justifies the use of any other measure. This leaves us at a loss as to which policy should be chosen in the non-trivial cases for which there is substantial disagreement between the different measures in their assessment of policy.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HERCAE-5
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-05-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-09-16

Total views
104 ( #37,441 of 55,940 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
65 ( #10,859 of 55,940 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.