Exaltation and atrocity: why kenotic humility can’t justify divine concurrence of evil

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
ABSTRACT‘Exaltation views’ of humility are grounded on a kenotic view of humility, such that divine blessing comes proportionate to the extent to which an agent humbles herself. This article rejects exaltation views of humility which define humility kenotically, justify their arguments from a divine hiddenness perspective, and which conclude that divine concurrence with evil is justified as long as all humble believers eventually are exalted and blessed. Rather, I will contend that exaltation views misunderstand the meaning of both ‘humility’ and ‘exaltation,’ even from their own Christian standpoint. I ultimately offer an alternate response to the problem of evil based on an existentially grounded conception of ‘humility’, which provides for a transmuted turn away from individual kenotic acts and toward community to transform those who suffer from atrocities.
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2018
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HEREAA-7
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Problem of Evil.van Inwagen, Peter

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-11-08

Total views
60 ( #40,172 of 50,414 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #29,358 of 50,414 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.