The Wrong Kind of Reason

Journal of Philosophy 102 (9):437 - 457 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A good number of people currently thinking and writing about reasons identify a reason as a consideration that counts in favor of an action or attitude.1 I will argue that using this as our fundamental account of what a reason is generates a fairly deep and recalcitrant ambiguity; this account fails to distinguish between two quite different sets of considerations that count in favor of certain attitudes, only one of which are the “proper” or “appropriate” kind of reason for them. This ambiguity has been the topic of recent discussion, under the head “the wrong kind of reasons problem.”2 I will suggest that confusion about “the wrong kind of reason” will be dispelled by changing our account of what a reason is. While I agree both that reasons are considerations and that certain..
ISBN(s)
0022-362X  
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HIETWK
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-09-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Responsibility for Believing.Pamela Hieronymi - 2008 - Synthese 161 (3):357-373.

View all 85 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
944 ( #1,780 of 38,910 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
134 ( #2,606 of 38,910 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.