Hawthorne’s Lottery Puzzle and the Nature of Belief

Philosophical Issues 17 (1):120-122 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the first chapter of his Knowledge and Lotteries, John Hawthorne argues that thinkers do not ordinarily know lottery propositions. His arguments depend on claims about the intimate connections between knowledge and assertion, epistemic possibility, practical reasoning, and theoretical reasoning. In this paper, we cast doubt on the proposed connections. We also put forward an alternative picture of belief and reasoning. In particular, we argue that assertion is governed by a Gricean constraint that makes no reference to knowledge, and that practical reasoning has more to do with rational degrees of belief than with states of knowledge.

Author Profiles

Joshua Schechter
Brown University
Christopher Hill
Brown University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
515 (#27,561)

6 months
131 (#21,004)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?