The nomological argument for the existence of God

Noûs 56 (2):443-472 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


According to the Nomological Argument, observed regularities in nature are best explained by an appeal to a supernatural being. A successful explanation must avoid two perils. Some explanations provide too little structure, predicting a universe without regularities. Others provide too much structure, thereby precluding an explanation of certain types of lawlike regularities featured in modern scientific theories. We argue that an explanation based in the creative, intentional action of a supernatural being avoids these two perils whereas leading competitors do not. Although our argument falls short of a full defense, it does suggest that the Nomological Argument is worthy of philosophical attention.

Author Profiles

Tyler Hildebrand
Dalhousie University
Thomas Metcalf
Spring Hill College


Added to PP

2,385 (#3,157)

6 months
662 (#1,794)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?