The Nomological Argument for the Existence of God

Noûs (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to the Nomological Argument, observed regularities in nature are best explained by an appeal to a supernatural being. A successful explanation must avoid two perils. Some explanations provide too little structure, predicting a universe without regularities. Others provide too much structure, thereby precluding an explanation of certain types of lawlike regularities featured in modern scientific theories. We argue that an explanation based in the creative, intentional action of a supernatural being avoids these two perils whereas leading competitors do not. Although our argument falls short of a full defense, it does suggest that the Nomological Argument is worthy of philosophical attention.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HILTNA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-03-20
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-03-02

Total views
443 ( #15,333 of 65,550 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
180 ( #2,854 of 65,550 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.