Are There Any Epistemic Consequentialists?

Episteme 19 (2):220-230 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Selim Berker argues that epistemic consequentialism is pervasive in epistemology and that epistemic consequentialism is structurally flawed. is incorrect, however. I distinguish between epistemic consequentialism and epistemic instrumentalism and argue that most putative consequentialists should be considered instrumentalists. I also identify the structural problem of epistemic consequentialism Berker attempts to pinpoint and show that epistemic instrumentalism does not have the consequentialist problem.

Author's Profile

Tsung-Hsing Ho (何宗興)
National Chung Cheng University

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-25

Downloads
269 (#32,913)

6 months
86 (#10,821)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?