Tense and the psychology of relief

Topoi 34 (1):217-231 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
At the centre of Arthur Prior’s ‘Thank goodness’ argument for the A-theory of time is a particular form of relief. Time must objectively pass, Prior argues, or else the relief felt when a painful experience has ended is not intelligible. In this paper, I offer a detailed analysis of the type of relief at issue in this argument, which I call temporal relief, and distinguish it from another form of relief, which I refer to as counterfactual relief. I also argue that existing discussions of the ‘Thank goodness’ argument—including Prior’s own—fail to give a satisfactory account of temporal relief, and that it needs to be seen as an emotion linked to the ability to engage in fairly sophisticated forms of planning. I also suggest that this has an impact on Prior’s claim that the idea of points in time plays no fundamental role in the semantic analysis of tenses
Reprint years
2015
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOETAT-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-05-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics.Sider, Theodore; Hawthorne, John & Zimmerman, Dean W. (eds.)
Real Time Ii.Mellor, D. H.

View all 47 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-11-12

Total views
301 ( #10,607 of 41,550 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
89 ( #5,456 of 41,550 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.