Aesthetics, experience, and discrimination

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (2):119–133 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Can indistinguishable objects differ aesthetically? Manifestationism answers ‘no’ on the grounds that (i) aesthetically significant features of an object must show up in our experience of it; and (ii) a feature—aesthetic or not—figures in our experience only if we can discriminate its presence. Goodman’s response to Manifestationism has been much discussed, but little understood. I explain and reject it. I then explore an alternative. Doubles can differ aesthetically provided, first, it is possible to experience them differently; and, second, those experiences reflect differences in the objects’ themselves. A range of objections to this position is considered, but all are found wanting.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOPAEA
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-10-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
460 ( #10,902 of 55,821 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #36,986 of 55,821 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.