Realism in film (and other representations)

In Katherine Thomson-Jones (ed.), Current Controversies in the Philosophy of Film. Routledge (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
What is it for a film to be realistic? Of the many answers that have been proposed, I review five: that it is accurate and precise; that is has relatively few prominent formal features; that it is illusionistic; that it is transparent; and that, while plainly a moving picture, it looks to be a photographic recording, not of the actors and sets in fact filmed, but of the events narrated. The number and variety of these options raise a deeper question: what is realism, if these are all to count as species of it? In answer, I articulate a sort of picture we have of realism, not just in film but in representations in general. I then ask how far each of the candidate realisms fares, when compared with that image.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOPRIF
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-09-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-09-01

Total downloads
198 ( #12,695 of 36,570 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #7,335 of 36,570 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.