Realism in film (and other representations)

In Katherine Thomson-Jones (ed.), Current Controversies in the Philosophy of Film. Routledge (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
What is it for a film to be realistic? Of the many answers that have been proposed, I review five: that it is accurate and precise; that is has relatively few prominent formal features; that it is illusionistic; that it is transparent; and that, while plainly a moving picture, it looks to be a photographic recording, not of the actors and sets in fact filmed, but of the events narrated. The number and variety of these options raise a deeper question: what is realism, if these are all to count as species of it? In answer, I articulate a sort of picture we have of realism, not just in film but in representations in general. I then ask how far each of the candidate realisms fares, when compared with that image.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOPRIF
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-09-01
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-09-01

Total views
655 ( #7,565 of 2,425,830 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
149 ( #3,627 of 2,425,830 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.