Testimony, Transmission, and Safety

Abstracta 4 (1):27-43 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Most philosophers believe that testimony is not a fundamental source of knowledge, but merely a way to transmit already existing knowledge. However, Jennifer Lackey has presented some counterexamples which show that one can actually come to know something through testimony that no one ever knew before. Yet, the intuitive idea can be preserved by the weaker claim that someone in a knowledge-constituting testimonial chain has to have access to some non-testimonial source of knowledge with regard to what is testified. But even this weaker claim has a counterexample which I develop in close connection with a safety-account of knowledge. Thus, testimonial statements can sometimes enable us to know something for which none of our informants has any source of knowledge available. I conclude that my counterexample nevertheless does not affect the core of our intuitions about testimony, although it establishes that testimony can indeed be a fundamental source of knowledge.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HORTTA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-12-13
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-03-04

Total views
334 ( #16,284 of 56,919 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #22,057 of 56,919 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.