Ambidextrous Reasons (or Why Reasons First's Reasons Aren't Facts)

Philosophers' Imprint (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The wrong kind of reason (WKR) problem is a problem for attempts to analyze normative properties using only facts about the balance of normative reasons, a style of analysis on which the ‘Reasons First’ programme depends. I argue that this problem cannot be solved if the orthodox view of reasons is true --- that is, if each normative reason is numerically identical with some fact, proposition, or state-of-affairs. That’s because solving the WKR problem requires completely distinguishing between the right- and wrong-kind reasons for an attitude. I argue that some facts give both right- and wrong-kind reasons for an attitude. Consequently, no such distinction between the two types of reasons is complete if reasons are facts or the like. I conclude by suggesting that reasons and facts are related by constitution, not identity.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOWARO-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-01-11

Total views
79 ( #45,604 of 2,432,432 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
79 ( #8,548 of 2,432,432 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.