Moral Fetishism and a Third Desire for What’s Right

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A major point of debate about morally good motives concerns an ambiguity in the truism that good and strong-willed people desire to do what‘s right. This debate is shaped by the assumption that ‘what‘s right‘ combines in only two ways with ‘desire‘, leading to distinct de dicto and de re readings of the truism. However, a third reading of such expressions is possible, first identified by Janet Fodor (1979/2014), which has gone wholly unacknowledged by philosophers in this debate. I identify Fodor‘s non-specific reading of ‘desire to do what‘s right‘ and briefly discuss its merits.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOWMFA
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-02-22
Latest version: 2 (2021-02-22)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-02-22

Total views
47 ( #49,766 of 56,931 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #16,488 of 56,931 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.