Odpovědi přátelům

Filosofie Dnes 9 (2):91-110 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
[Replies to My Friends] This is an answer to the critics of my book WHAT IT'S LIKE, OR WHAT IT'S ABOUT? THE PLACE OF CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE MATERIAL WORLD (2017). I proceed from the least to the most serious objections. I start with Jakub Mihálik’s defense of Russellian Monism against my claim that it is not a genuine alternative to standard dualism and materialism. In reply, I claim this is a side issue to the central aim of my book, which is to undermine the concept of phenomenal consciousness assumed by Russellian Monism as much as by every other standard theory. One of these standard theories is reductive materialism, pursued by Michal Polák and Tomáš Marvan. Both Polák and Marvan are worried by Dennett’s alleged eliminativism, even though their arguments somewhat differ. Polák believes in a deflationary concept of consciousness, which I am afraid lacks a definite content. Marvan offers an “innocent” concept of consciousness, on which there is supposed to be a general consensus, but I think he just assumes that the concept of phenomenal property is part of the definition of consciousness. Curiously, while Polák and Marvan take me as to be a Dennettian, Stefanie Dach argues that I misinterpret Dennett. Conversely, I believe that she overlooks weak points in Dennett’s theory.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Brainstorms.Dennett, Daniel C.
Brainstorms.Dennett, Daniel

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
45 ( #42,342 of 48,898 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #41,208 of 48,898 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.