COVID-19 Vaccination and the Right to Take Risks

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The rare but severe cerebral venous thrombosis occurring in some AstraZeneca vaccine recipients has prompted some governments to suspend part of their COVID-19 vaccination programmes. Such suspensions have faced various challenges from both scientific and ethical angles. Most of the criticisms against such suspensions follow a consequentialist approach, arguing that the suspension will lead to more harm than benefits. In this paper, I propose a rights-based argument against the suspension of the vaccine rollouts amid this highly time-sensitive combat of COVID-19. I argue that by suspending a vaccine rollout, a government infringes people's right to take the risks they deem worth taking for their health. I also consider four potential objections to my argument and explain why none of them undermines my argument.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-05-09
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
21 ( #68,267 of 69,180 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #37,662 of 69,180 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.