Moral Enhancement, Self-Governance, and Resistance

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (5):547-567 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
John Harris recently argues that the moral bioenhancement proposed by Persson and Savulescu can damage moral agency by depriving the recipients of their freedom to fall (freedom to make wrongful choices) and therefore should not be pursued. The link Harris makes between moral agency and the freedom to fall, however, implies that all forms of moral enhancement, including moral education, that aim to make the enhancement recipients less likely to “fall” are detrimental to moral agency. In this paper, I present a new moral agency-based critique against the moral bioenhancement program envisaged by Persson and Savulescu. I argue that the irresistible influences exerted by the bioenhancement program harms our capabilities for conducting accurate self-reflection and forming decisions that truly express our will, which subsequently undermine our moral agency.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HUAMES
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-02-18
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-06-13

Total views
35 ( #52,563 of 56,863 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #38,814 of 56,863 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.