Providing for Rights

Dialogue 27 (3):489- (1988)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Gauthier's version of the Lockean proviso (in Morals by Agreement) is inappropriate as the foundation for moral rights he takes it to be. This is so for a number of reasons. It lacks any proportionality test thus allowing arbitrarily severe harms to others to prevent trivial harms to oneself. It allows one to inflict any harm on another provided that if one did not do so, someone else would. And, by interpreting the notion of bettering or worsening one's position in terms of subjective expected utility, it allows immoral manipulation of others and imposes unwarranted restrictions based on preferences that should carry no moral weight.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-05-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Morals by Agreement.Gauthier, David

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Non-Tuism.Hubin, Donald C.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
203 ( #21,343 of 50,238 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #14,444 of 50,238 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.