Offices and God

Sophia 29 (3):29-34 (1990)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Pavel Tichy presents an interpretation of Anselm’s Proslogion III argument. Tichy presents an interpretation of this argument and raises doubts about one of the premises. The authors contend that Tichy’s interpretation of Anselm is wrong. The argument Tichy comes to raise doubts about is not Anselm’s.
Keywords
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HUGOAG
Revision history
Archival date: 2011-03-28
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-02-28

Total views
102 ( #23,878 of 40,131 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #35,156 of 40,131 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.