Offices and God

Sophia 29 (3):29-34 (1990)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Pavel Tichy presents an interpretation of Anselm’s Proslogion III argument. Tichy presents an interpretation of this argument and raises doubts about one of the premises. The authors contend that Tichy’s interpretation of Anselm is wrong. The argument Tichy comes to raise doubts about is not Anselm’s.
Keywords
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HUGOAG
Upload history
Archival date: 2011-03-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-02-28

Total views
161 ( #37,005 of 65,538 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #51,901 of 65,538 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.