Responsive Government and Duties of Conscience

Jurisprudence 5 (2):244-264 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper defends a new argument for enabling citizen participation in government: individuals must have genuine opportunities to try to change the law in order to be able to satisfy duties of conscience. Without such opportunities, citizens who regard systems of related laws as partially unjust face a moral dilemma. If they comply with these laws willingly without also trying to change them, they commit a pro tanto wrong by willingly participating in injustice . If they disobey, or if they obey only to avoid sanction, they respond inadequately to the morally important purposes that the laws advance despite their injustice. Government should help citizens avoid this dilemma. This argument bolsters the non-instrumentalist view that responsiveness in the political process is desirable even if it does not promote just legislative outcomes. It also helps to explain what governments owe to citizens with minority political views.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HUGRGA
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-11-01
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-12-31

Total views
57 ( #41,287 of 51,431 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #44,929 of 51,431 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.