Ockhamism without Thin Red Lines

Synthese 191 (12):2633-2652 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper investigates the logic of Ockhamism, a view according to which future contingents are either true or false. Several attempts have been made to give rigorous shape to this view by defining a suitable formal semantics, but arguably none of them is fully satisfactory. The paper draws attention to some problems that beset such attempts, and suggests that these problems are different symptoms of the same initial confusion, in that they stem from the unjustified assumption that the actual course of events must be represented in the semantics as a distinguished history, the Thin Red Line
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2014-01-12
Latest version: 2 (2016-06-20)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Counterfactuals.Lewis, David K.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Back to the actual future.Wawer, Jacek & Malpass, Alex

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
455 ( #9,258 of 50,260 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #24,329 of 50,260 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.